||Screening for Family Violence
Information For Clinicians
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for
or against the use of specific screening instruments to detect family violence,
but recommendations to include questions about physical abuse when taking
a history from adult patients may be made on other grounds (see Clinical Intervention
Clinicians should be alert to the various presentations of child abuse, spouse
and partner abuse, and elder abuse.
Burden of Suffering
Family violence is a serious public health problem for many Americans.
Family violence includes child abuse (physical
and sexual abuse), domestic violence (physical
or sexual abuse of spouse or intimate partner), and elder
abuse (abuse or neglect of older
Because many cases of family violence
go unreported, the true magnitude of the problem can only be estimated.
In 1993, child protective service agencies substantiated maltreatment
of over 1 million children in the U.S. (a rate of 14/1,000 children); over
1,028 deaths due to child maltreatment were reported in 1993.
Intentional injury is the leading cause of injury-related death in children
under 1 year of age.
Parents or other relatives
are responsible for over 90% of reported cases of child maltreatment.
In addition to physical injuries, children who have been
victims of or witnesses to violence often experience abnormal physical, social,
and emotional development; adolescents and adults who were abused as children
are more likely to abuse tobacco and alcohol, attempt suicide, and exhibit
violent or criminal behavior.
cases of child sexual abuse were reported in 1993,
but the true incidence has been estimated to be as high as 450,000 cases per
In sexual abuse cases where the abuser was
known to the child, over two thirds involved abuse by family members.
Girls are victims of sexual abuse two and a half times
more frequently than boys.
Child sexual abuse often
results in severe psychological trauma,
associated with a variety of psychological problems persisting into adulthood,
and can cause medical complications such as sexually transmitted diseases.
Teens who had been sexually abused were significantly more likely than nonabused
controls to be sexually active, to abuse alcohol or drugs, and to have attempted
number of parental and family characteristics have been identified as risk
factors or risk markers for child physical abuse -- poor social support,
low socioeconomic status, single parent family, and unplanned or unwanted
-- but abuse is usually the result
of multiple interacting factors.
Abuse of drugs
or alcohol, although not clearly an independent risk factor, often coexists
with conditions (poverty, social isolation, etc.) that increase the risk of
Abusive mothers are often themselves victims
of physical violence by their spouse or partner,
and abusive parents often experienced abuse as children. A poor understanding
of normal child development, poor anger control, and use of physical punishment
as a discipline technique are more common among abusive parents.
In contrast, demographic or family characteristics are of little value in
predicting risk of child sexual abuse.
the prevalence of domestic violence among couples vary depending on the source
of data and definition of violence.
A national survey
of 50,000 households conducted in 1992 and 1993 estimated that over 1 million
women (9.3/1,000) and nearly 150,000 men (1.4/1,000) are victims each year
of assault, robbery, or rape committed by their spouse, ex-spouse, or intimate
over half of these incidents result in minor
injury, and 3% in serious injury (broken bones, loss of consciousness, hospitalization,
This estimate may be conservative due to
underreporting. In a comprehensive survey of family violence, involving detailed
interviews of a total of 8,145 families in 1975 and 1985, 16% of couples reported
instances of violence in the previous year (including shoving, slapping, or
grabbing); 40% of these episodes involved more serious actions such as kicking,
punching, or use of a weapon.
In recent surveys, 2-3% of women reported being kicked, bitten, or
hit with fist or some other object by their partner in the preceding year.
Family studies indicate that
both men and women engage in violence against partners, but women are the
primary victims of chronic battering and episodes leading to injury.
In 95% of episodes of domestic violence leading to criminal
and 59% of spouse murders,
women were the victims. The prevalence of domestic violence
is also high among female patients in clinical settings: 15% of women visiting
an emergency department
and 12-23% of women
in family practice settings
reported having been physically abused or threatened by their partner within
the last year. Domestic violence tends to be repetitive -- female victims
reported an average of six violent incidents per year.
The psychological consequences of abuse can be as important as physical injuries:
abused women may suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder, and they are more
likely than nonabused women to be depressed, attempt suicide, abuse alcohol
or drugs, and transfer their aggression to their children.
Violence between spouses or partners can occur
in families from all demographic and economic strata of society,
but risk of physical assault appears higher for some groups of women. Women
who are under age 35, have not attended college, are of lower socioeconomic
status, or are unmarried are more likely to report being victims of domestic
A review of 52 studies found that only
one risk marker -- witnessing parental violence as a child or adolescent
-- was consistently associated with being a battered spouse.
Childhood family violence and alcohol problems are more common among abusive
In general, however, the primary care
physician is not able to predict reliably which patients are likely to be
affected by domestic partner violence.
Pregnant women are also at risk from domestic violence.
In surveys of pregnant women (primarily from urban, public
clinics), 7-18% of women reported physical abuse (including forced sexual
activity) during the current pregnancy.
Many studies have reported an
association between violence and worse outcomes in pregnancy. Battered women
are more likely to register late for care, suffer preterm labor or miscarriage,
or have low birth weight infants than nonabused controls.
Elderly persons are also vulnerable to physical or psychological
abuse or neglect by family members or other caregivers.
Community surveys in Boston and Canada estimated that 3-4%
of persons over age 65 are victims of physical abuse, neglect, or regular
that appear to increase vulnerability to abuse among older persons include
poor or failing health, cognitive impairment, and lack of family, financial,
or community support.
The abuser is usually a relative,
most often the spouse.
Family members who have a
history of substance abuse, mental illness, or violence, or who are financially
dependent on the elder person, are more likely to be abusive.
Accurate estimates of the medical consequences of elderly abuse (patient
visits, hospitalizations, or costs of care) are not available.
It is estimated that less than 1 in 5 cases of elder abuse is reported, due
to denial or minimization of the problem by the victim, abuser, or health
In one report, up to 60% of elder
abuse victims admitted for acute medical care remained permanently institutionalized.
The incidence of mistreatment of elders in institutions
is not known. A survey of nursing home staff revealed that 36% of the staff
had witnessed physical abuse, and 81% had witnessed psychological abuse of
Accuracy of Screening Tests
Family violence may come to
attention when it results in severe injuries, but ongoing abuse often goes
unrecognized in the clinical setting. The clinical can identify victims of
domestic violence through the patient interview, use of a standardized questionnaire,
or the physical examination.
There are few reliable techniques
for screening for child abuse. Questionnaires can identify risk factors for
child abuse and neglect, but the potential to falsely label families as "potential
abusers" is a limitation to their use in clinical practice.
Eliciting evidence of child physical or sexual abuse through patient interview
is difficult. Young children may not be able to answer reliably, both child
and parent may be ashamed or fearful of admitting to abuse, and some abusive
parents may not regard their use of physical punishment as abuse. Most authorities
recommend exploring for potential problems with open-ended, nonjudgmental
questions about parenting and discipline (e.g., "What do you do when he misbehaves?
Have you ever been worried that someone was going to hurt your child?").
The value of standardized questions
or screening instruments to improve the detection of child abuse is not known.
Physical findings suggestive of abuse noted during routine or symptomatic
examinations have been described.
and other lesions can be suggestive due to their appearance (e.g., patterns
resembling hands, belts, cords, and other weapons) or location (buttocks,
lower back, upper thighs, and face). Multiple traumatic injuries without
a plausible explanation are also suspicious. At the same time, accidental
injuries may produce similar findings in children, and many abused children
(especially victims of sexual abuse) have no obvious physical findings. In
a survey of studies of sexually abused children, normal examinations were
reported in up to 73% of girls and 82% of boys.
Neither the sensitivity nor specificity of screening for abuse with physical
examination is known.
Some studies report that less than 10% of
battered women are accurately diagnosed by physicians, even in hospitals with
an established protocol for this problem.
The routine patient interview often fails to detect abuse
in adult patients, in large part because physicians do not routinely ask about
domestic violence. Only a third of physicians in one survey felt that routine
questions on abuse should be part of the annual examination.
Many physicians are reluctant to ask about abuse, out of fear of offending
their patients, inability to "fix" abusive relationships, frustration in dealing
with resistant patient behavior, and lack of time to deal with the problem.
Both victim and abuser may deny abuse for a variety of
reasons -- embarrassment, psychologic repression, or fear of reprisal,
abandonment, or legal consequences.
Consistent use of screening
protocols significantly improves the detection of abuse as a cause of trauma,
and similar measures have been shown to increase the detection
of domestic violence affecting pregnant and nonpregnant outpatients. The
large majority of abuse victims favored routine questions about abuse, and
half indicated that they would volunteer information about domestic violence
only if specifically asked.
Directly asking individuals
about the occurrence of abuse has been shown to elicit more positive reports
(29% vs. 7%) than the use of a written self-report.
The Abuse Assessment Screen, containing five questions on the frequency and
severity of past and current physical abuse and forced sexual activity, has
been validated against more comprehensive instruments in pregnant women.
Incorporation of this instrument into the standard social
service interview of pregnant patients significantly increased the detection
of recent abuse compared to historical controls (15% vs. 3%).
There are fewer studies on screening for elder abuse. The value of
the patient interview may be limited if the abuser is present. A 15-item
instrument for detecting elder abuse had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity
of 91% in a pilot study, but has not been validated for screening in routine
Effectiveness of Early Detection
The repetitive nature
of family violence suggests that early detection may be important in preventing
future problems from abuse. Specifically, patients can be counseled about
the nature and course of family violence, given information about available
resources (community counseling and support groups, shelters, protective service
agencies, etc.), and counseled about means to prevent further abuse. Psychological
counseling, by either the primary care clinician or a mental health professional,
may help the patient terminate personal relationships with violent individuals.
The clinician may also identify individuals who are at increased risk of
committing abuse in the future. Such persons may be referred for psychiatric
counseling or family therapy to learn stress management and nonviolent alternatives
for conflict resolution. Finally, the clinician is able (in many instances,
required) to report suspected cases of abuse and neglect to appropriate protective
service agencies for further evaluation and intervention.
studies in child abuse have concentrated on primary prevention.
Two randomized clinical trials have shown that home visits to high-risk families
decrease the rate of child abuse and the need for medical visits early in
need to be ongoing to retain effectiveness: extended follow-up of one of
these trials found no effect of intervention on the rate of abuse and neglect
later in life (ages 25-50 months).
most clinicians do not have the option of providing this level of intervention.
Studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for abused children are
limited, and their results have been mixed.
abuse despite interventions may occur in up to 60% of cases.
The effectiveness of treating sexual abusers of children remains controversial;
one outpatient program reduced recidivism by half.
The effectiveness of early intervention for domestic violence is also
difficult to determine. Most interventions for spouse abuse (e.g., shelters,
legal action) are crisis oriented and have been directed at women who have
already been injured by domestic violence. The options available to women
are often limited by associated factors common in abusive relationships:
financial dependence on an abusive partner, fear of retribution, alcohol or
drug problems, or psychological vulnerability.
As a result, many abused women decline offers of help.
For women who do attempt to terminate an abusive relationship,
the available resources to assist them are often limited and temporary. In
a controlled study of battered women leaving a shelter, women who received
services of an advocate for 4-6 hours per week reported better overall
quality of life, but no significant difference in levels of physical abuse,
compared to controls.
Whether treatment of abusive
men is effective in reducing domestic violence remains controversial. A randomized
trial of group therapy (vs. standard care) for convicted wife-abusers showed
that repeat abuse was significantly lower for the treatment group.
Effective approaches to couples who engage in mutual, less
severe violence (pushing, shoving, etc.) have not been developed. A large
controlled study is under way to examine whether an integrated program to
improve detection and management of domestic violence in the primary care
setting leads to better clinical outcomes.
Effective interventions for elder abuse may also be limited, in large
part because the abuser is often the primary caregiver to the victim.
If the only alternative is nursing home placement, victims
may be reluctant to give up their independence in order to escape abuse.
A review of elder physical abuse victims in Illinois reported that most victims
received few tangible services from social service agencies other than case
management (primarily monitoring).
elders, an advocate program decreased social isolation and improved services,
but a reduction in subsequent abuse was not demonstrated.
Recommendations of Other Groups
The American Academy of Pediatrics,
Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP),
and the Bright
all recommend that physicians
remain alert for the signs and symptoms of child physical abuse and child
sexual abuse in the routine examination. Bright Futures suggests including
questions about child discipline, and abuse of the child or parents, at the
discretion of the clinician. The AMA's Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive
Services (GAPS) recommend that teens should be asked annually about a history
of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse.
of screening devices to identify families at risk for child maltreatment is
not recommended by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination
Legislation in all states requires health
care professionals to report suspected cases of child abuse.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG),
the U.S. Surgeon General,
College of Physicians,
and the AAFP
all recommend that clinicians be alert to the possibility of domestic violence
as a causal factor in illness and injury. ACOG and AMA guidelines on domestic
violence recommend that physicians routinely ask women direct, specific questions
ACP and AAFP
guidelines are currently under review. An expert panel convened by the National
Research Council and the Institute of Medicine (Washington, DC) to evaluate
the effectiveness of family violence interventions is scheduled to publish
its findings in 1996. Healthy People 2000, a report of national health objectives,
and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
recommend that all emergency departments
use protocols to improve the detection and treatment of victims of domestic
The CTF determined that there was insufficient evidence
to include or exclude case-finding for elder abuse as part of the periodic
health examination, but recommended that physicians be alert for indicators
of abuse and institute measures to prevent further abuse.
The AMA recommends that physicians routinely ask elderly patients direct,
specific questions about abuse.
Many states require
reporting of domestic violence
and elder abuse.
Family violence is an important cause of physical and psychological
harm in children and adults, yet it often goes undetected by clinicians. Identifying
victims of domestic violence provides important information to clinicians
and may allow early intervention to reduce the risk from future abuse. Although
the benefit of routine screening has not been directly assessed, several factors
support greater efforts by clinicians to detect domestic violence between
spouses or sexual partners: the substantial prevalence of violent behavior
among couples, the repetitive nature of domestic violence, and its high medical
and societal costs.
Contrary to common perceptions,
most patients appreciate being asked about possible abuse, and direct questioning
may substantially increase reporting of episodes of domestic violence.
At the same time, clinicians face important obstacles in preventing
violence or sexual abuse within the family. The etiology of domestic violence
is multifactorial and is a function of social conditions, family conflict,
cultural attitudes, and biologic factors. Interventions for physical or sexual
abuse, mostly outside of the medical domain, vary greatly in effectiveness.
Although crisis interventions (arrests, referral to shelters) are appropriate
to protect victims in specific cases, there are few adequately controlled
studies to determine the effect of counseling or referral on the long-term
outcome of family violence. Appropriate screening methods for child abuse
and elder abuse are also uncertain. Screening for abuse through the patient
history is problematic with young children, may be unreliable if the abuser
is also present, and can be complicated by denial in all age groups. Errors
in diagnosing abuse are of great concern because of the serious emotional,
legal, and societal implications of either failing to take action in cases
of abuse or of incorrectly accusing innocent persons.
the limited and imperfect options for detecting and intervening in domestic
violence, the benefits are substantial for those families where the cycle
of abuse can be interrupted. It is also important for clinicians to maintain
a high index of suspicion when examining other persons at risk of physical
or sexual abuse (e.g., children and the elderly), to assess potential risk
factors for domestic violence, and to refer abuse victims and perpetrators
to other professionals and community services to help prevent future incidents.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend for
or against the use of specific screening instruments for family violence,
but including a few direct questions about abuse (physical violence or forced
sexual activity) as part of the routine history in adult patients may be recommended
on other grounds ("C" recommendation). These other grounds include the substantial
prevalence of undetected abuse among adult female patients, the potential
value of this information in the care of the patient, and the low cost and
low risk of harm from such screening. All clinicians examining children and
adults should be alert to physical and behavioral signs and symptoms associated
with abuse and neglect. Various guidelines are available to help clinicians
in recognizing abuse and neglect in children,
In all states, suspected cases of child
abuse or neglect must be reported to local child protective services agencies.
In most states, suspected elder abuse must also be reported.
All individuals who present with multiple injuries and an implausible explanation
should be evaluated with attention to possible abuse or neglect. Injured
pregnant women and elderly patients should receive special consideration for
this problem. Suspected cases of abuse should receive proper documentation
of the incident and physical findings (e.g., photographs, body maps); treatment
of physical injuries; arrangements for counseling by a skilled mental health
professional; and the telephone numbers of local crisis centers, shelters,
and protective service agencies. The safety of children of victims of abuse
should also be ensured.
The draft update of this chapter
was prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force by Craig F. Thompson,
MD, MPH, and David Atkins, MD, MPH, with contributions from materials prepared
by Christopher Patterson, MD, FRCPC, Harriet L. MacMillan, MD, FRCPC, James
H. MacMillan, MSc, and David R. Offord, MD, FRCPC, for the Canadian Task Force
on the Periodic Health Examination.
and domestic violence: can we make a difference?JAMA 1995;273:1790-1791.
Van Hasselt VB, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, et al.
, eds. Handbook of family
violence.New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Child maltreatment 1993:
reports from the states to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995.
Waller AE, Baker SP, Szocka A.
injury deaths: national analysis and geographic variations.Am J Public Health 1989;79:310-315.
Reece RM, ed.
Child abuse: medical diagnosis and management.Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1994.
Child abuse and neglect.N Engl J Med 1995;332:1425-1431.
Riggs S, Alario AJ, McHorney.
Health risk behaviors and attempted
suicide in adolescents who report prior maltreatment.J Pediatr 1990;116:815-821.
National Committee for Prevention of Child Abuse.
incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect.Washington, DC: American Humane Association, 1987.
Sexual abuse of children and adolescents.Adv Pediatr 1987;34:275-312.
Finkelhor D, Baron L.
Finkelhor D, ed. Sourcebook on child sexual abuse.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage,
KA, Williams LM, Finkelhor D.
Impact of sexual abuse on children: a review
and synthesis of recent empirical studies.Psychol Bull 1993;113:164-180.
Nagy S, Adcock AG, Nagy MC.
A comparison of risky health behaviors of
sexually active, sexually abused, and abstaining adolescents.Pediatrics 1994;93:570-575.
Biller HB, Solomon RS.
Child maltreatment and parental deprivation:
a manifesto for research, prevention and treatment. Lexington, MA: Lexington
role in preventing child maltreatment.Pediatr Clin North
Substance abuse and child abuse.Pediatr Clin
North Am 1990;37:881-904.
McKibben L, De Vos E, Newberger EH.
Victimization of mothers of abused
factors in the clinical identification of child sexual abuse.Child Abuse Neglect 1993;17:67-70.
Post, July 31, 1994:C1-C2.
Bachman R, Saltzman LE.
Violence against women: estimates
from the redesigned survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics special report.
Washington, DC: U.S.Department of Justice,
1995.(Publication no. NCJ-154348.)
Violence against women: a National Crime Victimization Survey
report. Bureau of Justice Statistics report. Washington, DC: U.S.Department of Justice, 1994.(Publication no. NCJ-145325.)
Straus MA, Gelles RJ, Steinmetz
Behind closed doors: a survey of family violence in America.New York: Doubleday, 1980.
Straus MA, Gelles RJ.
Physical violence in American families.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1990.
The Commonwealth Fund Survey of Women's
New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1993.
Cascardi M, Langhinrichsen J, Vivian D.
Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives.Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1178-1184.
Dawson JM, Langan PA.
Murder in families. Bureau of Justice
Statistics special report. Washington, DC: U.S.Department
of Justice, 1994.(Publication no. NCJ-143498.)
Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLain J, et al.
violence against women: incidence and prevalence in an emergency department
Hamberger LK, Saunders DG, Hovey
Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician
inquiry.Fam Med 1992;24:382-387.
Elliott BA, Johnson MM.
in a primary care setting.Arch Fam Med 1995;4:113-119.
The effects of
woman abuse on health care utilization and health status: a literature review.Women's Health Issues 1992;2:1154-1173.
Stark E, Flitcraft A, Zuckerman D, et al.
abuse in the medical setting: an introduction for health personnel. Monograph
no.7,Washington, DC: Office of Domestic Violence,
Hotaling GT, Sugarman DB.
analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: the current state of
knowledge.Violence Vict 1986;1:101-124.
Domestic violence.Primary Care 1993;20:289-305.
Mehta P, Dandrea LA.
The battered woman.Am Fam Phys 1988;37:193-199.
Campbell JC, Poland ML, Waller JB, Ager J.
of battering during pregnancy.Res Nurs Health
Peipert JF, Zieler S, et al.
Battering in pregnancy: an assessment of
two screening methods.Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:321-325.
Amaro H, Fried LE, Cabral H, et
Violence during pregnancy and substance use.Am J Public Health 1990;80:575-579.
Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, Wilkinson GS, et al.
associated with violence experienced by pregnant women.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1760-1769.
Parker B, McFarlane J, Soeken K.
pregnancy: effects on maternal complications and birth weight in adults and
teenage women.Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:323-328.
Schei B, Samuelsen SO, Bakketeig
Does spousal physical abuse affect the outcome of pregnancy?Scand J Soc Med 1991;19:26-31.
Council on Scientific Affairs.
Elder abuse and
Lachs MS, Pillemer K.
Abuse and neglect
of elderly persons.N Engl J Med 1995;332:437-443.
Pillemer K, Finkelhor D.
prevalence of elder abuse: a random sample survey.Gerontologist 1988;28:51-57.
National survey on abuse of the elderly in Canada.J Elder Abuse Neglect 1992;4:5-58.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
guide to clinical preventive health care.Ottawa: Canada
Communication Group, 1994:922-929.
Wolf RS, Pillemer K.
Helping elderly victims: the reality
of elder abuse.New York: Columbia University Press,
the reporting of suspected cases of elder abuse: an inappropriate, ineffective
and ageist response to the abuse of older adults.Fam
Law Q 1982;16:69-91.
Pillemer K, Moore DW.
Abuse of patients in nursing homes: findings from
a survey of staff.Gerontologist 1989;29:314-320.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic
Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care.Ottawa: Canada Communication Group, 1994:320-332.
Green M, ed.
guidelines for health supervision of infants, children and adolescents.Arlington VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child
Inflicted injury versus accidental injury.Pediatr
Clin North Am 1990;37:791-814.
Bays J, Chadwick D.
Medical diagnosis of the sexually abused
child.Child Abuse Neglect 1993;17:91-110.
Friedman LS, Samet JH, Roberts
MS, et al.
Inquiry about victimization experiences: a survey of patient
preferences and physician practices.Arch Intern Med
NK, Inui T.
Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence: opening
Pandora's box.JAMA 1992;267:3157-3160.
McLeer SV, Anwar RAH.
role of the emergency physician in the prevention of domestic violence.Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:1155-1161.
McFarlane J, Christoffel K, Bateman L, et al.
for abuse: self-report versus nurse interview.Public
Health Nurs 1991;8:245-250.
McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, et.
al. Assessing for abuse
during pregnancy: severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry
into prenatal care.JAMA 1992;267:3176-3178.
Neale AV, Hwalek MA, Scott RO,
Validation of the Hwalek-Sengstock elder abuse screening test.J Applied Gerontol 1991;10:406-418.
Olds DL, Henderson CR, Chamberlin R, et.
Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation.Pediatrics 1986;78:65-78.
Hardy JB, Streett R.
Family support and parenting education
in the home: an effective extension of clinic-based preventive health care
services for poor children.J Pediatr 1989;115:927-931.
Olds DL, Henderson CR, Kitzman
Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects
on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of
Costs and effectiveness
of interventions in child maltreatment.Child Abuse Neglect 1990;14:177-186.
The untreatable family.Child Abuse Neglect 1987;11:409-420.
Marshall WL, Barbaree HE.
An outpatient treatment program for child molesters.Ann NY Acad Sci 1988;528:205-214.
Campbell J, Fishwick N.
Abuse of female partners.In:
Campbell J, Humphreys J, eds. Nursing care of victims of family violence.St.
Larsson GE, Brismar BG, et.al.
Battered women -- their susceptibility
to treatment.Scand J Soc Med 1988;16:155-160.
Sullivan CM, Campbell R, Angelique
H, et al.
An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners:
six-month follow-up.Am J Community Psychol
Brown RA, Barrera ME.
Group treatment program for abusive husbands: long-term
evaluation.Am J Orthopsychiatry 1992;62:276-283.
Agency for Health Care Policy
AHCPR funds study to identify and treat victims of domestic
violence. Research Activities no. 184. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research, May 1995.(Publication no. 95-0063.)
Sengstock MC, Hwalek M, Petrone S.
aged abuse victims: service types and related factors.J Elder Abuse Neglect 1989;1:37-56.
An evaluation of a program of volunteer advocates
for elder abuse victims.J Elder Abuse Neglect
of Pediatrics, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Guidelines for the
evaluation of sexual abuse of children.Pediatrics
Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on child sexual
abuse.Chicago: American Medical Association,
American Medical Association.
and treatment guidelines on child physical abuse and neglect.Chicago: American Medical Association, 1992.
American Academy of Family Physicians.
for periodic health examination.Kansas City, MO: American
Academy of Family Physicians, 1994.(Reprint no. 510.)
American Medical Association.
for adolescent preventive services (GAPS): recommendations and rationale.Chicago: American Medical Association, 1994.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
battered woman. Technical Bulletin no. 124.Washington,
DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1989.
physicians to identify, assist victims of domestic violence.JAMA 1989;261:963-964.
American College of Physicians.
Domestic violence: position paper of the
American College of Physicians.Philadelphia: American
College of Physicians, 1986.
American Medical Association.
Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic
violence.Chicago: American Medical Association,
American College of Obstetricians
The obstetrician gynecologist and primary preventive
health care.Washington, DC: ACOG, 1993.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives.Washington, DC: Public Health Service, 1991:237-238.
(Publication no. PHS 91-50212.)
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
manual for hospitals. Vol 1, standards.Oakbrook Terrace,
IL: Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations,
Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on elder abuse and neglect.Chicago: American Medical Association, 1992.
Hyman A, Schillinger D, Lo B.
reporting of domestic violence: do they promote patient well-being?JAMA 1995;273:1781-1787.
Vidyya. Home |
Ex Libris |
Subscription Information |
About Vidyya |
Vidyya Archives |
Editor: Susan K. Boyer, RN
© Vidyya. All rights reserved.