||Combating Complacency In HIV Prevention
Complacency About Need For HIV Prevention The
Strongest Barrier As Communities Plan To Meet Next Century's Prevention Needs
In the United States, complacency about the need for HIV prevention may be among the
strongest barriers communities face as they plan to meet the next century's prevention
needs. The great success that many people, but not all, have had with new highly active
antiretroviral therapies (HAART, also known as drug "cocktails") and the resulting
decline in the number of newly reported AIDS cases and deaths are indeed good news.
The underlying reality, however, is that the HIV epidemic in our country is far from
over. This is true not only for the nation, but for the continuing number of HIV-infected
individuals who now must face years - perhaps a lifetime - of multiple daily
medications, possible unpleasant or severe side effects, and great expense associated
with the medicines needed to suppress HIV and prevent opportunistic infections.
The success of HAART is good news for the people living longer, better lives because of
it, but the availability of treatment may lull people into believing that preventing HIV
infection is no longer important. This complacency about the need for prevention adds
a new dimension of complexity for both program planners and individuals at risk.
- While the number of AIDS cases is declining, the number of people living with HIV
infection is growing. This increased prevalence of HIV in the population means that
even more prevention efforts are needed, not fewer. For individuals at risk,
increased prevalence means that each risk behavior carries an increased riskfor
infection. This makes the danger of relaxing preventive behaviors greater than ever.
- Past prevention efforts have resulted in behavior change for many individuals and
have helped slow the epidemic overall. However, many studies find that high-risk
behaviors, especially unprotected sex, are continuing at far too high a rate. This is
true even for some people who have been counseled and tested for HIV, including
those found to be infected.
- The long-term effectiveness of HAART is unknown. Further, HIV may develop
resistance to these drugs. The powerful treatments are complicated and involve
taking large numbers of pills. Even the most motivated patients may forget to take
all their medications or skip doses. Some patients have been known to take "drug
holidays," completely stopping their medications for a number of days or weeks.
These drug treatments are less effective when treatment schedules are not followed.
Diversions from the prescribed treatment regimen increase the possibility of drug
resistance developing, which would greatly narrow future treatment options for
those infected with a drug-resistant strain of HIV. And, if the development of drug-resistance is coupled with a relaxation in preventive behaviors, resistant strains
could be transmitted to others and spread widely.
- Research among gay and bisexual men suggests that some individuals are less
concerned about becoming infected than in the past and may be inclined to take
more risks. This may be equally true in other groups at risk who might believe they
no longer need to use condoms because protease inhibitors are so effective in
treating HIV disease. The truth is, despite medical advances, HIV remains a serious
and usually fatal disease that requires complex, costly, and difficult treatment
regimens. These treatments don't work for everyone. Sometimes when they do
work, they have unpleasant or intolerable side effects. Some people can't take them
because the interaction with their other drugs causes serious problems. Still others
find it extremely difficult to maintain the drug treatment schedules. As we continue
working to develop better treatment options, we must not lose sight of the fact that
preventing HIV infection in the first place precludes the need for people to follow
these difficult regimens.
The Challenge of Monitoring the HIV/AIDS Epidemic
The "treatment effect" on trends in the AIDS epidemic not only increases our need for
combating complacency, but means that we have never been closer to losing our ability
to monitor the epidemic.
- Until recently, AIDS cases provided a reliable picture of trends in the HIV epidemic.
Before highly effective treatments were available, researchers could take into
account the time between HIV infection and progression to AIDS and estimate
where and how many new infections were occurring based on observed cases of
disease. Today, trends in AIDS cases and deaths may provide a valuable measure of
groups for whom highly effective treatment is not available or has not succeeded.
However, they no longer tell us enough about where and how many new infections
are occurring - information critical for addressing the increasing need for
prevention and treatment services. To allow the U.S. to target programs and
resources most effectively, we must be able to keep pace with where the epidemic is
going. This means we need to improve our ability to track early HIV infections,
before they progress to AIDS.
Pay Attention to Prevention! It works...
Sustained, comprehensive prevention efforts begun in the 1980s have had a substantial
impact on slowing the HIV/AIDS epidemic in our country. While it is difficult to
measure prevention - or how many thousands of infections did not occur as a result of
efforts to date - we know the epidemic was growing at rate of over 80% each year in the
mid-1980s and has now stabilized. While the occurrence of approximately 40,000 new
infections annually is deeply troubling, we have made tremendous progress. We also
have more scientific evidence than ever before on which prevention programs are most
effective. There is no question that prevention works and remains the best and most
cost-effective approach for bringing the HIV/AIDS epidemic under control and saving
HIV prevention programs have been proven effective.
- Many studies indicate that prevention programs can contribute to changes in
personal behavior that reduce risks of infection, and these changes are sustained
over time. A 1997 scientific consensus conference sponsored by the National
Institutes of Health that reviewed existing data on the effectiveness of HIV
behavioral interventions concluded that "behavioral interventions to reduce risk for
HIV/AIDS are effective and should be disseminated widely."
- Comprehensive school-based HIV and sex education programs have been shown to
delay the initiation of sexual intercourse, reduce the frequency of intercourse, reduce
the number of sex partners, or increase the use of condoms or other contraceptives.
- Efforts to reduce risks of injection drug users through policy changes also have been
evaluated and found to be very effective. For example, both New York and
Connecticut reported significant reductions in the sharing of drug injection
equipment after implementation of programs and policies that increased access to
sterile injection equipment.
- Perinatal prevention programs that identify and treat pregnant women who are HIV
infected have shown dramatic success in reducing HIV transmission to their babies.
- Screening the blood supply for HIV and heat-treating blood products for the
treatment of hemophilia have nearly eliminated HIV transmission through these
early transmission routes.
- Postexposure prophylaxis for health care workers has shown some success in
reducing HIV transmission rates among those with occupational exposure to HIV-infected blood.
- Numerous HIV prevention programs have been shown to be cost-effective when
compared against the resources required to treat and deliver HIV medical care to a
person over the remaining years of their life. With the rising costs of lifetime
treatment of HIV, effective prevention has become even more cost effective. New
CDC estimates find that if only 1,255 infections are prevented each year, CDC's
federally funded HIV prevention efforts in the United States are cost effective. If
only 3,995 infections are prevented, our nation's investment in HIV prevention has
actually saved money.
Comprehensive HIV prevention programs work best.
- People with HIV risk behaviors need an array of prevention messages, skills, and
support to help them reduce sexual and drug-related risks. Drug injectors, for
example, not only need strategies to help them stop using drugs or sharing needles,
but also need to learn ways to protect themselves from sexual transmission if their
partner has ever injected drugs and may have shared needles.
- Substance use is a major problem in this country, and the intersection of substance
use and sexual HIV transmission cannot be overlooked. Ideally, everyone who
abuses any drug (including alcohol) should be offered counseling and treatment to
help them stop using drugs and prevent HIV infection. HIV prevention
interventions for the vast majority of substance users who are not in treatment also
must address the sexual risks that are common among people who use drugs,
including "crack" cocaine, marijuana, and alcohol.
- Each and every generation of young people needs comprehensive, sustained health
information and interventions that help them develop life-long skills for avoiding
behaviors that could lead to HIV infection. Such comprehensive programs should
include the involvement of parents as well as educators. The most effective
programs start at an early age and are designed to encourage the adoption of
healthy behaviors, such as exercising and eating a healthy diet, and to prevent the
initiation of unhealthy ones, such as drug use, excessive alcohol consumption,
smoking, and premature sexual activity, before they start.
- Scientific studies show that treatment of other sexually transmitted diseases can
greatly reduce the risk of transmitting and acquiring HIV.
The many dimensions of prevention provide multiple opportunities for intervention.
- Secondary HIV prevention means keeping people who already are HIV-infected safe
and healthy by helping them avoid opportunistic infections and stopping the
infection from progressing to AIDS.
- In all prevention efforts, there is a growing need to address the link between HIV
treatment and prevention. In some cases, such as preventing perinatal transmission
to infants by providing antiretroviral drugs to the mother, treatment is prevention.
We also know that the treatment of other STDs can greatly reduce a person's risk for
sexually acquired HIV infection. And, scientists even now are exploring the
possibility that combination drug therapies may reduce infectivity. With the lines
between prevention and treatment beginning to fade, ongoing services for people
who are HIV positive must balance medical advances with the behavioral and social
support needed to preserve their quality of life and prevent the spread of infection.
- We must maintain a focus on behavioral strategies. Even a vaccine doesn't stop a
disease unless people use it - and in the case of HIV, a vaccine is unlikely to confer
100% lifelong immunity. Because no medical advance can succeed on its own,
people must adapt their behaviors to work in tandem with it. To do this, they need
- Access to prevention services and new medical treatments. For example,
pregnant women who may not know they are infected with HIV cannot reduce
the risk of transmission to their children unless they first get prenatal care that
includes routine HIV counseling and voluntary testing. Those found to be
infected then must have access to antiretroviral drugs.
- Assistance in developing skills to use new medical treatments. HAART, for
example, involves complex treatment regimens and may require the
development of compliance-related skills. For example, people may need to
learn how to deal with side effects, what drug interactions might occur, how to
lessen the risk of developing drug resistance, or how to cope with complicated
- Support and encouragement from family, friends, care providers, and the
community at large will help people make and sustain behavioral changes in
Today, more than ever, we must recognize that medical advances do not negate the
need for preventing disease-in fact, the availability of newer and better treatments often
increases the need for prevention. How well we continue our work to develop
integrated approaches to prevention and treatment may well define the future course of
the HIV pandemic.
Vidyya. Home |
Ex Libris |
Subscription Information |
About Vidyya |
Vidyya Archives |
| | | |
Editor: Susan K. Boyer, RN
© Vidyya. All rights reserved.